This is unisym.html


Naturally I was somewhat irritated to find that Mozilla and Netscape _ hereinafter Netzilla _ have disabled the symbol font. For them _ but not for Opera _ the fixup is easy enough on the user side:
I definitely recommend keeping their way around for the purpose of comparing the new way with the old way. In fact, anybody who has the symbolps font can replace the last step with
That way, direct comparisons of characters from
 http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/encoding/symbol.html
and characters from symbolps can easily be made.

One of the major arguments in favor of disabling the symbol fonts has been that symbol and symbolps have major alignment defects, and another may be that some of their glyphs are unsatisfactory. (The l.c. epsilon, for example, is what LaTeX calls \varepsilon.) Fair enough, but perhaps somewhat overstated -- here is an example that contains comparisons of extended Times New Roman and symbolps characters.


O.K.:
The codes for the two inline equations are
&#xf8ec;A&#xf8f7; = &pi;r<u style=top:-3pt;font-size:10pt>2</u>

and
<s>ç</s>A<s>÷</s> = <s>p</s>r<u style=top:-3pt;font-size:10pt>2</u>
As far as I know, only Netzilla, modified in the second way described above, can render both equations, and Opera can't render either one.



Enhancements I would like to see Netzilla and Opera adopt are: If the new style catches on -- it is marginally better, after all -- other purveyors of browsers might then be urged to adopt similar enhancements.

Meanwhile, I'll continue to play around with both ways. And one more thing: the equations (with symbol or symbolps enabled, if possible) definitely look better on newer browsers than they do on NN4. Here is one that only works on Netzilla.